This is an outdated version published on 30-01-2025. Read the most recent version.

Strengthening Institutional Sustainability and Stakeholder Alignment: An Assessment of Perceptions and Support for Initao College, Misamis Oriental

Authors

  • Elpidio P. Requiz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.04237

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions and socio-political support of external stakeholders toward Initao College, a locally funded college in Misamis Oriental, Philippines. Utilizing purposive sampling, 80 respondents from four stakeholder groups—students, alumni, parents, and residents—were selected to participate in the research. The data was collected using the Institutional Sustainability Survey, which assesses the effectiveness of the institution’s programs and services across five key result areas outlined by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED). These areas include Governance and Management, Quality of Teaching and Learning, Professional Exposure and Research, Support for Students, and Community Relations. The results highlight the need for improvements in stakeholder awareness of the college’s Vision, Mission, Goals, and Objectives (VMGO). Recommendations include enhancing communication strategies, aligning perceptions through workshops, increasing the visibility of VMGO, fostering greater stakeholder involvement, and strengthening community engagement. Additionally, the study recommends establishing a system for regular feedback to guide the institution’s continuous improvement efforts. The findings suggest that more comprehensive strategies for engagement and communication are essential for Initao College’s institutional sustainability and stakeholder alignment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

30-01-2025

Versions

How to Cite

Requiz, E. P. (2025). Strengthening Institutional Sustainability and Stakeholder Alignment: An Assessment of Perceptions and Support for Initao College, Misamis Oriental. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 6(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.04237

Issue

Section

Education, Learning, Training & Development